Automated systems comparable to expert pathologists for prostate cancer Gleason grading

Automated Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Tissue Microarrays

We present the results on the development of an automated system for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading. Images of representative areas of the original Hematoxylin-and-Eosin (H&E)-stained tissue retrieved from each patient, either from a tissue microarray (TMA) core or whole section, were captured and analyzed. The image sets consisted of 367 and 268 color images for the diagnosis an...

Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Contemporary approach.

Update on the Gleason grading system for prostate cancer: results of an international consensus conference of urologic pathologists.

The Gleason system for prostate cancer was based on a study of 270 patients from the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Hospital in 1966-1967. In 1974, Gleason and the Veterans Administrative Cooperative Urological Research Group expanded this study to 1032 men. These studies formed the basis of the Gleason grading system, which is now endorsed as the primary grading system for prostate cancer...

Future-proofing Gleason Grading: What to Call Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer?

At the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology meeting, changes to prostate cancer grading were discussed including new prognostic Gleason grade groups 1-5 representing Gleason scores of 3+3, 3+4, 4+3, 8, and 9-10, respectively.

Interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: urologic pathologists.

Gleason grading is now the most widely used grading system for prostatic carcinoma in the United States. However, there are only a few studies of the interobserver reproducibility of this system, and no extensive study of interobserver reproducibility among a large number of experienced urologic pathologists exists. Forty-six needle biopsies containing prostatic carcinoma were assigned Gleason ...